12/05/2016 Q&A: Murazor

Hello,

thanks to Ivan for translating this Q&A as mine and Ctacello‘s brains are still fried from translating the last Q&A from Murazor, this is what could be salvageable from the amount of sh** answers this guy gives:

– the developers are considering implementing rewards for some difficult achievements (medals)
– artillery will be rebalanced during the global overhaul of other classes, in the future it will be more predictable and will cause less toxicity
– no plans for Patton KR penetration buff
– developers have nothing to do with premium vehicle prices
– regarding new maps – one of the old mapmakers returned to Wargaming, a guy who made the oldest maps, the players will see results in time
– FV4202 shells are too expensive but lowering their price is not a fast process
– IS-6 with HD model bounces more shells than the SD one used to
– there are currently no plans to buff or nerf specific vehicles unless they are really OP or are doing really poorly, everything else will come with the global overhaul
– developers are considering changing the repair kit and medkit to the cooldown system that’s in WoWs
– AMX M4 49 will definitely not be a regular vehicle
– track traces (visual effect) behind tanks will return once the game is fixed, not sooner

Liked it? Take a second to support Rita Sobral on Patreon!
12/05/2016 Q&A: Murazor

56 thoughts on “12/05/2016 Q&A: Murazor

    1. Peter Vis says:

      Some people that shoot at it are just plane retarded. They really need to make a video on how to pen it because most nubs are still shooting its angled sides when they have a perfect shot on the track area. Same as turret, they are going from the stereotype of stronk unpennable turret while the turret front can easily be pend.

      I am not saying its not OP but most people that whine about it are noobs that dont understand armor.

      1. and when you kill it with t34 the tomato is-6, and he just simply cant pen your turret, he autoreports you, because “you are hacker, and using penetrator and armor cheat” (based on true story ๐Ÿ˜€ )

  1. Peter Vis says:

    well that nerfing OP vehicles is not really being done… The O-i family will still be op because their armor isnt nerfed and they still have the same retarded alpha dmg at their tier. The T110E5 isnt getting a nerf in 9.15. The next patch will probs be the balance patch and then what did they do too OP vehicles… nothing because wargaming. A cooldown system for repair tool and medkit is not a good idea….. maybe something like max 3 time use on a small repair kit for 1 module each (same for medkit) and the large repair kit is 2 times a full repair on all modules.

    1. SlayerBR says:

      then people still believe in the myth of OI line being OP, I wonder if they even played the line before saying its OP =P

    2. Infernal969 says:

      The only thing making OIs really OP is the stupidity of an average player at their respective tiers.

    3. Teknokraatti says:

      Have you played the O-Is? O-I Experimental has 75-70mm armour everywhere, but due to hull shape and turret placement, effective sidescraping is only possible with your back end to the wall. That won’t help much though, because the turret is still not strong. Save for the unfortunate T3 and some T4 vehicles, all vehicles the O-I experimental sees penetrate it with relative ease.

      The strength of the O-I experimental is NOT its armour though. That tank has very good penetration and monstrous alpha for a T5 heavy, as well as superb DPM. It has also good mobility and is one of the best rammers in the game, at T5. While it is easy to hurt the O-I exp. it can usually dish damage at far higher rate than the enemies can.

      1. Matthew Shine says:

        lolwut?
        The amount of tomatoes I’ve seen in E5’s doing 5k+ damage since the buff is ridiculous…

  2. Anonymous says:

    “this is what could be salvageable from the amount of sh** answers this guy gives”

    Just how bad is this guy? Why does it seem like none of these guys can act professional? When you have to “salvage” excerpts from his responses in order to compile a Q&A, how are we, the community, supposed to respond? If this was any other kind of business, it would easily fail in the customer service/relations department.
    I don’t want to sound like a complainer, but seriously…. come on….

    1. He is bad… :/ for example Storm, when he answers he is direct and to the subject, Murazor instead is more focused on answering useless stuff, some of it not even game related and another times he is just trolling around, seems like he is incapable of being professional. I for example, I’m know for being jolly and playful on camera but when I do the blog I have my serious face on most of the time because it requires serious face to do a good job, it annoys me that he seems incapable of doing the same and wastes mine and other times with his BS.

      1. BattleBudgie says:

        You hate that guy with passion ๐Ÿ™‚ OK, I understand he’s bad, but Storm can be just as bad sometimes IMO. Mostly when he’s verbally giving the finger to players after questions he doesn’t like.

      2. Daedal says:

        Feels more like you have personal grudge or something.
        First I have no problem understanding what he writes (srsly)(not a native speaker (actually me trying to speak in russian would make ears bleed)), second the amount of answers is not that big and they are all in one place, so it is not that hard to sort out unrelated answers (besides he has to answer them, because he is also a known personality, so there can be many that would like to know something like those things, while they would not ask them to someone else unknown).
        Yes he likes to troll from time to time, that is how he is, he even has had a problem with this as part of his subscribers were rather dense and often did not understand that he was not serious, but here I am not sure if I noticed anything easy to misunderstand, could you give an example of which answers confused you? Preferably in original.
        What I do not know is what other questions he may have had, as the service he uses just sends them to him and he picks what to answer, but even if question is relevant that does not mean he could or would be permitted to answer.
        What I am curious sometimes is if he is giving answers he should (as a company official) or as he himself, because he often writes if it is his opinion (like he wrote about FV4202 shells “I agree about the price, ..”), but as much as I remember his opinion on +/-25% was quite different while he was still just a youtuber.

  3. i herz boobies says:

    โ€“ the developers are considering implementing rewards for some difficult achievements (medals)
    /// good… reward good play. punish bad ๐Ÿ˜€

    โ€“ developers are considering changing the repair kit and medkit to the cooldown system thatโ€™s in WoWs
    /// interesting… doesnt sound bad, if the cooldown is like 4 minutes or so…
    who hadnt a fight, where the very first shell broke something like gun or rack ? (or crew or both!)

  4. Anonymous says:

    any plans on making “vanilla” WoT server or game mode or something……because this global overhaul gives me a bad feeling

  5. sturmi0545 says:

    โ€“ the developers are considering implementing rewards for some difficult achievements (medals)

    wow! like literally every other game, which awards medals to players, does.
    goddamn soviet real life lag. So sad to see how darn late WG is implementing standard(!!) gameplay elements, which probably will be introduced with the impression of being extra generous towards us playing peasant scum…

    (I’m not ranting again, am I?)

  6. OrigamiChik3n says:

    “track traces (visual effect) behind tanks will return once the game is fixed, not sooner”.

    What’s wrong with track traces? Last time i played WoT the traces were there.

  7. Anonymous says:

    >AMX M4 49 will definitely not be a regular vehicle

    …why do I expect another IS-5 stunt? Because clearly only the chosen elite deserves this stuff. /sarcasm

  8. Klimax says:

    Looks like I will be able to use my skillset with FV304/Bishop/leFH with more SPGs! Great. Not sure though if it will reduce toxicity…

    As for IS-6: I don’t know before HD version, but it can do some bouncing. in the end though it is fairly fast HT, so it has to be played accordingly. (Seems closer to FV204 (A45))

    1. Its fv201, not that that matters, but think about it, its as fast as the fv201 has a similiar DPM, but for heavies alpha is more important, so Id say the gun is better. Especially if you consider that fv201 has NO armour at all, the hull cant bounce a single shell and the turret only does lucky bounces while IS6 is one of the best armoured tier 8s, the thing is so balanced….

      I as a UK tank fan feel like WG either hates UK or loves USSR/USA too much, cause there are 4 really good british tanks, matilda, fv304, cromwell and comet, pretty much all others are average or bad. (And then they have the audacity to nerf the centurion while it wasnt good already, yay high pen gun, mediocre turret armor and view range were the good things now they remove the turret armour, *sigh*

      1. Klimax says:

        Ups. (And I was checking its name in WOT wiki…) Hull can do some little nice bouncing, but not anywhere close to rest of HTs.

        I would include Bishop as great. (Not easy, but can do some brutal damage to other tanks

      1. Klimax says:

        Scare quotes? Fun. I don’t think you know a thing. But then, you likely never yet was on receiving end of barrage by Bishop… (Always fun teaching idiots that camping is bad idea and driving in predictable trajectory in LT is not great idea either)

        And that’s the difference haters never understood. Those who know and are skilled can be extremely dangerous. Those who just click are not. (Just random noise, although usually they are found playing sniper TDs, because just clicking in SPG will not get you anywhere)

  9. FingerOfGod says:

    I’ve a lot about the “global overhaul” when all the problems will be fixed by a reset to anything/everything.

    When is this slated to occur? No one seems to know, or can point to an actual date.

    Thanks.

  10. Bananaslug599 says:

    I keep hearing about this upcoming “Global Overhaul”, but it really has never been defined. Exactly what is it? Is it one massive upcoming patch? Is it over several patches? Is it just vehicle tuning? Is it a completely new system to calculate everything in the game? Is it soon? Is it not soon? Is the game already being overhauled? Currently the information is too vague…

  11. Anonymous says:

    โ€“ developers are considering changing the repair kit and medkit to the cooldown system thatโ€™s in WoWs

    It already appear on WoTBlitz .

  12. siralexice says:

    Pentration and dispersion on FV201 is shit, it’s a british tier 7 ffs. 150 damage should be compensante by precision at least.

  13. Alex Knight says:

    โ€“ FV4202 shells are too expensive but lowering their price is not a fast process

    Say what ?! How hard can it be to erase a 6 and replace it with a 3 ?!?!?! monkeys -.-

    1. Very hard, they need to make sure to make enough profit ๐Ÿ˜‰

      Lets hope all other 20pdrs get their shell cost nerfed as well, cause those shells are way too expensive, especially the prem shells should be made to cost relative to alpha.

  14. siralexice says:

    IS6 bounces more… about how many times they ate shit assuring us that no, it is not the case
    FV4202 shell price is difficult to lower? How in God’s name is difficult to put the same price AT15 shells for the 20pdr have?!

  15. Anonymous says:

    now if only they would rebalance the economy to be more in line with WOWS then they would have more of a player base again.

  16. โ€“ regarding new maps โ€“ one of the old mapmakers returned to Wargaming, a guy who made the oldest maps, the players will see results in time

    hope he doesn’t make sh*t maps like the asian maps

Leave a Reply