Yuri Pasholok Mini-Digest

30

Hello,

there’s a mini-digest from Yuri Pasholok:

sg5mubtq_rg

-Batchat 35t, is a fake or there actually existed drawings of it? -It’s a fake. The first prototype was a 12-ton and then from that they improved it into a 25-ton (Bat.-Châtillon 25 t AP), the latter was built but there are no projects for a 35-tonne.

-“There is someone who claims he has drawings of a Batchat 35t. He says he went to France and found them.” -I am still researching in the matter but I personally haven’t seen such a thing. Although wouldn’t surprise me if that was the case (that he indeed found it). I found documents of a 34 334 kg and another 35 434 kg (Arty) and under this logic, a 35-tonnes should exist.

-The Panzer III Ausf.K was planned to have a conical gun, why in-game it has a KwK L43 instead? -It was planned, the issue is that installing such a gun would require us to change other modules like the hull and tracks.

-Player complains that he knows about many French HTs that were never released from SuperTest and others that Yuri Pasholok knows of and asks, would it be possible to have an alternative full French HT line? Yuri says: We will see. Wargaming seems fairly positive about this.

Liked it? Take a second to support Rita Sobral on Patreon!

30 comments on “Yuri Pasholok Mini-Digest

  1. royshein says:

    who is he and what is that gun he is holding? (I think its a 40mm, or 23… cant decide)




    0



    0
    • Anonymous says:

      He is the guy WG hires to search in archives for data and info on new tanks. He gives WG the stuff they need to make the tanks…




      0



      0
    • Shade01982 says:

      That would be Yuri. Don’t recognise the gun…




      0



      0
    • GrimmReaperBG says:

      A fantasy writer/drawer. He creates vehicles that never existed and pretends he has found drawings of them(he draws them in his own basement).




      0



      0
      • Shade01982 says:

        You have any proof to back that statement up? I’d be really interested in what drawings you claim are fake…




        0



        0
      • Ferda Mravenec says:

        What about those Jap shits? And E50M, E5, FV 215, WTE etc? Or Grille 15, which was just thinked about with 15 cm sFH gun, not with that nonsence the German industry would never be able to made in 1945? These (and many others) are pure fakes for which this arrogant .hithead is at least co-responsible.




        0



        0
      • royshein says:

        yeh… its easy job then… “just thing of something German” “OH I KNOW! Stughetzer E65?”
        “give us something Russian!” “i got this! IS-12, stronk soviet engineering according to sekrit dokumintz made in 1917.”
        “but we cant add it we don’t have ww1 tanks really”




        0



        0
      • Santos says:

        Thank God, he does it. Cause of him and this kind of work, we have a great game. This fills in the gaps of the game.




        0



        0
      • Ferda Mravenec says:

        There are people thinking the opposite way, especially when there are the “gaps filled” by something like the Japanese heavies. And if you think abou Pasholok himself, his research and his fake tanks, think also about those “at least paper designs”, which were then fucked up by either directly by him or other WG “designers”. Think about the mentioned Grille 15 with its paper howitzer exchanged for some UFO gun, think about the scaled down E25. Anyone familiar with the tank design would come pointing “where do you want to place that 21 liter, 1.2 ton Maybach engine, transmission, KwK 42 gun, ammo and four faschos?”. No respect for these self proclaimed experts altering reality to their needs.




        0



        0
    • royshein says:

      Ok so I will call it “The Sekrit dokumints maker”




      0



      0
  2. Mark Varry says:

    A PzIII K with a Konisch gun and 150mm pen at tier 5 would actually be useful. cant have that.




    0



    0
  3. Diego2015 says:

    “-The Panzer III Ausf.K was planned to have a conical gun, why in-game it has a KwK L43 instead? -It was planned, the issue is that installing such a gun would require us to change other modules like the hull and tracks.”

    Yaaay, let’s just shit out as many premiums as possible. Don’t tell me that since the Pz. III K was leaked they didn’t have enough time, hogy change the modules.




    0



    0
  4. Infernal969 says:

    Plz gib French TOGs.




    0



    0
  5. Havoc199 says:

    The Panzer III Ausf.K was planned to have a conical gun, why in-game it has a KwK L43 instead? -It was planned, the issue is that installing such a gun would require us to change other modules like the hull and tracks.

    Aka…..we are fucking lazy and German tank must be shit right….




    0



    0
    • vladceltroll says:

      They clearly don’t want anything Western to be better than their Soviet s*it tanks which couldn’t even shoot without breaking during the first seconds of the battle.
      After all, this is what they want: make the game as unbalanced as possible so that players begin to buy stuff more and more often, which means moar $$$ for SerB’s rocket moon project (which is just a mockery made to justify their moneygrab)




      0



      0
    • vladceltroll says:

      If you’ve read something that was posted a while ago (again, sort of like a Q&A witg this Russian freak), you might know that he went as far as giving them all the necessary info to create a full tier 3-10 French HT branch, but, most probably the Balancing derp-art-ment threw them off the window. This is how retarded some of their employees can get. I, personally, think there’s even more stuff like this which hasn’t been introduced, only because they’d make Russian tanks underpowered when compared to them.




      0



      0
  6. Legiondude says:

    “The Panzer III Ausf.K was planned to have a conical gun, why in-game it has a KwK L43 instead?”

    Who wrote this crap? The Ausf. K proposal and the test vehicle which mounted Waffe 0725 are months apart from each other




    0



    0
  7. Legiondude says:

    “The Panzer III Ausf.K was planned to have a conical gun, why in-game it has a KwK L43 instead?”

    Who wrote this crap? The two vehicle designs were separated months apart




    0



    0
  8. siralexice says:

    This guy is clearly an idiot, 1st the tank is a fake, 2nd the fake tank should exist…




    0



    0
    • Shade01982 says:

      I think this is something that is lost in translation a bit. His first statement are about the BC 35t that surfaced a while ago. THAT one is a fake. But his second statement is about 35t projects in general, of which he said they *might* exist, but he just hasn’t found them yet.




      0



      0
    • royshein says:

      and 50% of WoT’s tech tree is Fake. #SekritDokumintzRule




      0



      0
  9. Just remember – i’m also fake
    Real Yuri Pasholok gone to center of the Earth 10 years ago.




    0



    0
  10. Jamesdoz says:

    He looks like just what I pictured. A Russian nerd




    0



    0
  11. Jason Wilhite says:

    Royshein, it depends on your standard for false. I think most tanks in WOT, 80 to 90% were at least in the concept stage. Do they take liberties with the fine details yup, but if not the tanks would be not competitive it seems.




    0



    0
  12. Jamesdoz says:

    Looks just like I imagined. Russian nerd




    0



    0
  13. Admiral_Mikan says:

    Still waiting for Jagdpanther’s 88 autoloader………….




    0



    0

Leave a Reply