Supertest: T92 LT Full Stats



the T92 LT stats just came out, thanks to Ctacello for helping out:



Tier: 7
Hitpoints: 840
Engine: 340
Weight: 16 987
Power-to-weight: 20.02 hp/t
Maximum speed: 60/25 km/h
Hull traverse: 70 deg/s
Turret traverse: 52.1 deg/s
Terrain resistance: 0.288/0.384/1.055
Viewrange: 400
Radio range: 745
Hull armor: 31.8/25.4/?
Turret armor: 28.6/28.6/?

Gun: 76 mm Gun T185E1
Damage: 150/150/185
Penetration: 175/210/38
DPM: 2085.7
ROF: 13.905
Reload: 4.315 s
Accuracy: 0.403

Aimspeed: 1.82

Armor and Model:


In-Game Screenshots:

49 comments on “Supertest: T92 LT Full Stats

  1. royshein says:

    Oh ma gud dat detailing! Its almost like they asked WoWp devs to make it

  2. James k says:

    Looks like fun.
    It will be nice to have a not tier 3 and below crew trainer for American lights.

  3. macusflash says:

    Gun depression?

  4. Deano says:

    so the americans are going from no high tier prem lts to 2? this and the t71 cmd or what ever its called.

  5. tango35 says:

    Kind of looks like the SP 1C.

  6. Good that they replaced the non-autoloader T71 premium with this. A new tank instead of a slightly modified copy-paste…
    Or at least I hope that’s what it is

  7. Ultrasonic2 says:

    WOWOW that PW and terrain Resistance will make this amazingly fast / the fastest tank in the game ?

    i might be interested if this has good gun depression but it look like is has stuff all and thus useless

  8. septfox says:

    Power-to-weight: 20.02 hp/t
    Hull traverse: 70 deg/s
    Terrain resistance: 0.288/0.384/1.055

    Ahahaha oh god that’s going to be silly.

    Does anyone happen to know how big it’s supposed to be? 17 tons isn’t exactly the lightest thing (the SP1C for instance is ~10t, the T71 is ~20t), so I’m going to guess it’s bigger than it looks.

  9. DeadArashi says:

    Hey Rita, is there any chance we could get a side by side size comparison to the other tier 7 light tanks?

  10. Anonymous says:

    What are the crew details on it???

  11. Soifon99 says:

    hey look a copy of the non auto loading bulldog, or just the same old gun from the american lights as always.. come on people at wg, think of something different for once.. we already have the T71/bulldog/T71CMDC with this gun.. so now the T92? … Zzzz

    • DeadArashi says:

      Were you born this stupid? Or did you have to work on it?

      You’re talking about tanks built in the 1950’s… no shit they would be re-using the same guns/engines/etc, why change development process when what was already being mass produced was effective against what it was used for?

  12. stormcrow99 says:

    Please don’t be premium.
    And if it will be, please don’t replace T71 CMCD.

  13. whitebaron777 says:

    Damn, and people complain about Russian tanks having good terrain resistances

  14. siralexice says:

    Stolen directly from Armored Warfare.

    • Anonymous says:

      how much would warthunder have stolen from world of tanks then?

    • Someone says:

      Precisely what I was gonna say. WG running out of tanks, now they are stealing from AW.

      • royshein says:

        they are not stealing from AW. they planned to add it a long time ago. And plus, if they copy from AW it will only make the game better

      • Jack Fisher says:

        Last time i checked, Neither WT or AW or even WG owned the tank’s design, so noone is stealing from anyone, just because its in one game doesn’t mean anything, its like saying “AW stole the basic tank combat design from WG because of the HP system it has and armour penetration mechanics!” Its just pointless and stupid to even bother saying stuff like that.

    • wheeledtank says:

      Then I hope it has the 3.5 degrees of forward gun depression that way I can charge into battle backwards

    • Captain obvious says:

      I asked the chieftan back in 2013 about a light tank tree for the US, and he said that this was one of thier priority tanks because it’s unique. They did not steal it from AW, and plus, AW is a literal clone of WoT in almost every respect, and was based on WoT’s code. WG would at any one time the right to rip obsidian a new arsehole because of the similarly and what the devs have said in the past about WG and AW.

  15. big booty no aids says:

    Literally best terrain resistance in the game combined with best hull traverse in the game, on top of that thing is very low on height so I assume batshit good camo values as well. Seems too good for non russian tank, will most likely be “”””””””””””””””rebalanced””””””””””””””””””””””

  16. gpc_4 says:

    Looks like an interesting tank, much better then a slightly different T71. I’d certainly purchase the T92 if it was released as a premium tier VII LT.

    I wonder what the crew layout will be. Hopefully 4 crew that match up with the T37/Bulldog/T49 and not 3 crew like the T71.

  17. Coco says:

    150 alpha for 4.3s reload time? Looks kind of bad to me. The Bulldog non-autoloader gun fires faster than that I believe (I could be wrong, been a long time since I used anything else than the autoloader)

  18. Rich Vail says:

    Will this be for sale, or is it a prize?

Leave a Reply to Soifon99 Cancel reply