Swedish Strv 103-0 *Updated* Stats

23

Hello,

these are the updated statistics of the Swedish Strv 103-0:

Tier: 9
Hitpoints: 1 450 (1 510)
Engine: 600 (730)
Weight: 37 000
Power-to-weight: 16.2 (35.5)
Maximum speed: 50/45 km/h
Hull traverse: 40
Turret traverse: 16 (26)
Terrain resistance: 0,8/0,9/1,6
Viewrange: 360 (380)
Radio range: 850
Hull armor: 40/30/30 (18/16/16)
Turret armor: What turret?

Gun: 10,5 cm kan strv 103 L/62
Damage: 390/390/480
Penetration: 308/350/53
DPM: 2273.7 (2507.7)
ROF: 5.83 (6.43)
Reload: 10.3 (9.33)
Accuracy: 0.4 (0.3)

Aimspeed: 3s

Armor:

 

Liked it? Take a second to support Rita Sobral on Patreon!

23 comments on “Swedish Strv 103-0 *Updated* Stats

  1. banjoman150 says:

    REMEMBER GUYS: As Quickybaby mentioned in his video, the stats shown here are the ones in driving mode. When going in the Firemode the stats improve across the board. So keep that in mind before whining that its UP




    0



    0
    • wheeledtank says:

      I remember that I mentioned that it “may” be the “Moving” stats. Nice to see that it was the case. Would be nice to see the “Siege” states though




      0



      0
  2. Anonymous says:

    so a tier 9 td that has only 360 view range Who the F though this was a good idea???




    0



    0
  3. james doz says:

    So a tier 9 td with 360 view range Who The at WG thought this was a F good idea, They are so Clueless, they just stumbled upon a good game and they can’t stop Fcking it up




    0



    0
  4. Anonymous says:

    so which are the old and which are the new ones? the quality of “articles” here has gone to the shitter




    0



    0
    • Rita Sobral says:

      Or maybe you are just in that small percentage of people who cant keep up with simple things. there’s always been one order, you don’t even need to search or have to go that far to know it.




      0



      0
    • Havoc199 says:

      The ones in bold are the only ones that have been changed.
      The brackets show the old value and next to it is the new value.

      I suggest being more polite to those who are providing this service since they don’t have to and get nothing out of it.
      Not to mention that you could have asked nicely anyway.
      On top of all that this simple method has been used since forever even on For the Record in the old days. So stop whining.




      0



      0
      • Wa says:

        That may be true, but at the same time insulting parts of your readership base is not exactly the best way to go about things.




        0



        0
    • Havoc199 says:

      Let’s respond in like then…

      Fuck you, you whiny little bitch.

      Now let’s see how you respond to that. There are way too many self conceited arrogant little bastards these days. You expect everything on a silver platter and when you don’t get it you throw a tantrum. Act like a fucking human being and have some respect for others.

      Considering the comments I see on here sometimes it’s no wonder the writers would insult you. They do this for free with no profit. And every post : We don’t have enough info. There’s too much info. Whine. Whine. Whine.
      The amount of whine by people who think they deserve everything is ridiculous.
      Sure mistakes are made but nothing is perfect.

      So to sum up. Fuck off. And once you have fuck off some more. Thank you.




      0



      0
      • Duncan says:

        Bravo! I complely agree! Hate the attitude some people think they are entitled to when they provide nothing, but think it normal to piss all over people who actually do provide valuable information, etc.




        0



        0
      • Rita Sobral says:

        There are patrons that support the blog monetarily but the money goes into keeping the page running. Thank you for understanding and for the support.




        0



        0
  5. SpeedyCraft51 says:

    Not a good tank at all. But at least the armor holds




    0



    0
  6. Anonymous says:

    oh please. I spend every waking hour learning how you mislabel things on here daily and have to go back and correct shit so I can assume what means what the next time




    0



    0
    • Duncan says:

      Way to be a MAJOR asshole, dude… don’t like it? Don’t visit or just show some gratitude for the service the people behind the site are providing and the time they are putting into it, instead of whatever you want to call how you would label your post. You must be one of those infallible peeps.




      0



      0
  7. sturmi0545 says:

    The old hp/kg ratio should be 19.73, shouldn’t it? 35.5 seems a bit high.




    0



    0
  8. sturmi0545 says:

    also, there is a turret traverse speed, but no turret armour ;). Siege mode hull traverse speed, I assume.




    0



    0
  9. chenalexfjfj says:

    Turretless tank destroyers traverse their guns directly. 35.5 hp/t is the new value, not the old.




    0



    0
  10. Jostiewagner says:

    Yeah, about the quality of the posts down the shitter.. maybe its just the quality of a very few readers thats gone down the shitter buddy… and as for the viewrange nerf; remember WG’s view and policy to give back the scouting role to the Lights? And so drop the viewrange on the TD’s?




    0



    0
  11. Ian McIntosh says:

    Rita,you wonderful woman,is there any possibility of having the Siege mode stats added to the above? (and plse ask the Gnome overlord for anPzS35 review,I’ve only been asking since he had 20k subs….




    0



    0
  12. Ioruba - NA server says:

    gay.




    0



    0

Leave a Reply