27th December Micro Patch.

17

The Contents of the patch.

  • Fixed the problem of re-entering the game after a client crash.
  •  Minimized the problem with the lack of opportunities at the start of the battle in Strongholds.
  • Supertesters received the Strv S-1
  • profitability of the 121B was increased to the same level as other CW reward tanks.
  • T26E5 received a buff to the turret side Armor.

Source

Liked it? Take a second to support jerryatrick53 on Patreon!

17 comments on “27th December Micro Patch.

  1. StyleZ says:

    T26E5 definitely needed a buff.. :-\




    0



    0
  2. banjoman150 says:

    Special statistics for newly introduced premiumtanks showed that T26E5 was underperforming…




    0



    0
    • banjoman150 says:

      … is it just me or did the commonder cupola get smaller too … unbelievable




      0



      0
    • Under performing because the unicorns couldn’t get 15 kills a game or under performing because all the wallet warriors couldn’t get 15 kills a game? For a lot of tanks equal and lower tier against the E5, the only way to bring it down was from the side. Anything higher tier could just blitz through its frontal armor but that’s nothing new for any tier 8 heavy so essentially, they made it tougher for lower tiered tanks to fight the E5.




      0



      0
    • 😛 sorry for the overkill comment, I only just realized you were using sarcasm




      0



      0
  3. kinch07 @EU says:

    “Minimized the problem with the lack of opportunities at the start of the battle in Strongholds.” – what the fuck is that supposed to mean?!




    0



    0
  4. Marco Bergsma says:

    Somehow I don’t think the profitability on the 121B was “increased”




    0



    0
  5. Anonymous says:

    Tank Inspector still works ???




    0



    0
  6. Anonymous says:

    Tank Inspector still works ????




    0



    0
  7. Brett Brakefield says:

    Excuse me while I roll on the floor, laughing my ass off. The T26E5 did NOT need a buff. Particularly, it did not need a buff to it’s armour, and that’s what it got on the turret side.

    Unbelievable. It’s bad enough I do fair enough on my own T26E5, but this is just…come on, is it really that hard to do decent in the Heavy Pershing?




    0



    0
  8. Muhamad Adhi says:

    I don’t really see the point of this E5 buff, really.
    Well, as long as they doesn’t touch its Speed/mobility. Its alright for now.




    0



    0
  9. Anonymous says:

    nothing says “we need more money” as buff to Heavy Pershing, maybe some buff to Liberte too? ……those two tanks are rerollers wetdreams … but hey:WG needs to make a living too




    0



    0
  10. Renarde Martel says:

    This buff is probably to compensate for the fact that the Patriot version of T26E5 does not have the spare tracks on it’s turret, which the normal T26E5 does have. Basically, the Patriot was slightly worse than the unskinned version, and this fixes that.




    0



    0
  11. srsly 121B need dpm buff, not credit buff.




    0



    0

Leave a Reply