FV205 Initial Stats

56

Good day everyone,

Initial stats for the new Tier 10 TD set to replace the FV215b 183.

  • Tier : 10
  • HP: 2050
  • Weight: 65t
  • Engine Power: 950hp
  • Power to Weight: 14.62 hp/t
  • Speed: +34.3/-12 kph
  • Hull Traverse: 22 deg/sec.
  • Terrain Resistance: 1.726/1.918/2.877
  • Hull Armor: 304.8/101.6/20mm
  • View Range: 390m
  • Signal Range: 782.1m

  • Gun: OQF 123mm Mk.1
  • Damage: 420/420/520
  • Penetration: 272/320/130mm
  • Reload: 6.808 sec
  • Accuracy: .288
  • Aim Time: 1.63 sec.
  • Traverse Arc: 30 deg.
  • Depression: -10 deg.
Liked it? Take a second to support DecoNoir on Patreon!

56 comments on “FV205 Initial Stats

  1. Nafre says:

    I love the look of this. I need to farm for my fv215b 183 before its all lost




    10



    0
    • Anonymous says:

      The hardest part will be deciding if u want to part ways with the tortoise or just buy silver




      1



      0
    • GenAlex says:

      But why don’t give people the option of grinding the Fv215b183 from the Conqueror for example? Now I think even some paying customers who don’t play often enough will not have the time to grind it…
      Also, now WG cares about line consistency? What about the M-103 and the T110E5 who really don’t fit their line?




      3



      3
      • Anonymous says:

        How does the M103 and E5 not fit their line, strong turret armor decent hull armor, and a good gun with average DPM… it’s the same from tier 7 upwards…




        0



        0
  2. Youu says:

    Do you happen to know if this is happening this coming patch as well as the replacement of the tier 10 heavy?




    0



    1
  3. Anonymous says:

    This is SO WRONG! The FV215b 183 is an iconic TD in the game, and most like to play it and see it in game. Why would Wargaming take this very fun tank out of the game? People play WoT for fun….




    6



    34
    • Enigmaticmuffin says:

      because a supertortoise sounds a hell of a lot better than a copy of the JPE




      9



      1
    • Anonymous says:

      The 183 doesn’t belong in the tree. Wargaming admitted it in a video saying how the change from tier 9 to 10 is the most drastic compared to all other TD branches. As I have 500+ games in the 183 it would be sad to see it go, but change is welcome.




      20



      1
      • Philip Kerry says:

        If you already have the 215b or the 183 then you will be keeping them as they are being designated as reward tanks , they will stay in your garage and you will get the new tier X replacements as well . The 215b and 183 will just not be available in the tech tree again so DON’T SELL THEM as you will lose them for good 🙂




        2



        0
    • GolKosh says:

      It doesn’t get out of the game sir. If you have it you keep it 😉 You get an extra tank for free 😉




      0



      0
    • Roland says:

      This is the new “trend”, replace tanks, to “force” people into playing unpopular lines and premium tanks. New WoT’s paradigm. What never changes, it’s the “fuck the players” mind set.




      8



      10
      • Berto72 says:

        the new trend “force” people to grind so players play more for credits, pay more often for golds, buy more often premiums tanks




        0



        0
    • Color_Hawk says:

      If you Own the 183 you get to keep it




      1



      0
  4. DickherMax says:

    How come people use Tank Inspector even for releasing supertest leaks, but no one is interested in keeping the project alive.




    4



    0
  5. Anonymous says:

    But meh deathstar 😢




    3



    7
  6. lukas93h says:

    The DPM of 3701 without rammer and BiA looks very impressive. I wonder if the armore profile is more effective than that of the Tortoise.




    7



    0
  7. ccamfield72 says:

    No one is taking away your deathstars (if you have them already!)

    I kinda like the look of this 🙂




    1



    0
  8. Anonymous says:

    I don’t mind WG removing the tier 10 heavy FV215(b), since it never existed in the first place, but the Deathstar was a real project and is a very unique tank in the game. I’d hate to see it go.




    4



    0
  9. Never mind says:

    This thing looks like love! I can not wait to have her. For all its fame, the 183 never the fit the line and was just a one trick pony.




    1



    0
  10. alehodero says:

    That 3.7k dpm though.




    1



    0
  11. Anonymous says:

    Looks nice, but why does the russian 122mm gun on a tier 9 TD get 440 alpha dmg, but the 123mm gun on the british only 420 alpha dmg??




    0



    0
  12. Enigmaticmuffin says:

    3701 DPM HELL FUCKIN YEAAAAAAH
    SUPER TORTOISE
    SUPER TORTOISE




    9



    0
  13. skeeve666 says:

    it looks like the love child or a tortoise and a t95.




    10



    0
  14. Nocomment says:

    If that thing finds its way onto a ridge line it will be an absoloute beast by the look of it.
    3,7k dpm -10 degrees gun dep 30 degrees traverse and very bouncy armour given the slope. On the flat however that armour looks pretty poor.

    Selfishly I don’t care about the Fv’. I get to keep mine and this is another tank i will get…./leaves the building.




    0



    0
  15. Rogais says:

    Loved Tortoise, would be happy to get Tortoise at tier X without the bigass weakspots on the frontal armor. This seems like magic. Unless it has bigass weakspot on the frontal armor. Which it will, because you can’t ask people to figure out the “going around thing”.




    0



    0
  16. Blankman says:

    Those 2 300mm parts looked like an angry face with a long ass nose for the gun..




    0



    0
  17. Feor says:

    nearly 4.8k DPM possible




    0



    0
  18. Nayan S says:

    British with a 123mm gun?
    123mm? Is that a typo, or a weird British measurement something-pounder gun?
    I know they had a 60-pdr field piece, but that was a 120mm artillery cannon…

    Is the gun legit, or another WoT invention for the sake of game balance and money-making?




    1



    0
  19. RAD FROOD 25 (Console) says:

    God’s I wish I had a gaming PC that way I’d actually witness balance and what looks like actual tanks not pathetic reskins




    0



    0
  20. Dunpeal says:

    I don’t get why they’re replacing fv215 and not this godawful fv4005…




    0



    0
  21. Nameless says:

    Wargaming, I want some of your weed! I need to get carried away and forget how unbalanced the game has become! Please!




    0



    0
  22. Ville Lepoaho says:

    So, a better T110E3? 😀




    0



    0
  23. Anonymous says:

    Can I expect the deathstar to be replaced roughly around the end of the year?




    0



    0
  24. General Soren says:

    This is called FV 217 not 205 i have seen this in many disscusions even dead arishi agrrees about this




    0



    0
    • Anonymous says:

      yeah, I’ve been concerned too, FV205 was based from FV201 which was lead to the conqueror, FV217 was based from FV214 (Conqueror) which has literally no blueprints, just an index to be a self-propelled anti-tank gun on a conqueror platform, however in this case but the FV205 superstructure upon the FV214 Conqueror… WG better have a explanation…

      though it may be understandable, the FV201 had armour 76.2mm on the hull and 152mm on the turret, if it was the ‘original’ FV205, then it would have poor engine power, less armour or probably more and armed with a 120mm gun, would probably be Tier VIII or IX.




      0



      0
  25. Basically ” welcome t95 with speed “




    0



    0

Leave a Reply