K-91 & Object 277 Fuller stats + Captures

27

We now have screen caps with almost full stats and some more pics of the K-91 and Object 277. Original Russian left English overlay right then pics.

Russian Stat grabs and pics from WoT News. English overlays by RSR.

27 comments on “K-91 & Object 277 Fuller stats + Captures

  1. lukas93h says:

    those guys at WG got insane…

    where are is the compensation to the excelent armor? the gun stats are insane… the penetration values are way too high for standard shells and the rest of the parameters are also very good.




    10
    • Anonymous says:

      TF are you on?
      Where’s that “excellent” armour?
      140 front hull is “excellent”?
      60/112 side is just begging for an HE shell from a KV-2(or Jap howitzer)




      2
      • lukas93h says:

        140mm may sound thin, but considering the sloping, it’s effective value will be much higher.

        and the thin side armor is thick enough so it doesn’t get overmatched and is almost completely covered by the tracks so HE/HEAT/HESH will detonate before reaching the 60mm.




        0
  2. mobility on the k-91 looks like absolute crap for a top tier medium. aside from that both these tanks look good to me




    3
  3. D8W2P4 says:

    I find it kinda funny how the pictures keep avoiding the K-91’s right (tumor) side of the turret.




    10
  4. mredweird says:

    The terrain resistances on 277 are waaaaaaaay too high.




    8
  5. the terrain resistances will hinder this tank, i was hyped to the fact that i can compete with a 5a, but guess not. A tank already power creeped before its out




    6
  6. i mean sure the accuracy is super good and all with the stock 0.33 in final stats however in my op it would have been better to nerf to 0.35 and make resistances better




    1
  7. Anonymous says:

    Too bad the stats do not enlarge enough to be able to read them. but really who reads stats? just look at the pretty photos.. 😛




    1
  8. jerryatrick53 says:

    The text in the pic is about the same size as my windows text when I click on the pic and maximise the window.




    1
  9. fuwgbafnwmfs says:

    I’m done with this trash game – once my prem time and gold runs out….




    10
  10. Anonymous says:

    A uglier frying pan and a new 113 yay…




    0
  11. crumlicharts says:

    On one hand, I’m super hyped for the 277. On the other hand, I’m seriously pissed that my tier X Christmas discount is stuck with the IS-7 now, which is no longer a priority.

    I get that WG wanted to balance things a little better, and this whole Soviet HT thing this year has been kinda cool, but everything they did as far as compensation with the T-10 assumes that we were only playing the T-10 because we wanted the IS-7, and not (As is the case for me) that we were playing the T-10 because it’s a great tank and we wanted a tier X vehicle a lot like it.




    5
  12. heldermartins1 says:

    These are the new russian tanks to be deployed to Syria, in an effort of misleading… errmm… something something…




    0
  13. OrigamiChik3n says:

    Jeopardy! Wargaming style: There are two tanks. One tank has 55KpH top speed and 11HP/t power-to-weight ratio. The other has 55KpH and 17HP/t respectively. Which one of them is medium and which one is heavy?




    9
  14. The max load lomit is wrong. For the K91 atleast the max weight of modules without equp on is 57600 while the max load limit is 50000. And for 277 it’s 72850 for modules while the max load limit is 60000. KEK




    0
  15. WhiteBaron777 says:

    Without looking at the armor in detail these both seem mediocre




    0
  16. Synvy (Tea) says:

    Please not behind the T-10, would far rather have 777 because why not




    2
  17. Anonymous says:

    any idea when this is coming out?




    0
  18. OrigamiChik3n says:

    Funny thing is – if you try looking for images of K-91 you won’t find a machine looking like the one in WoT. There were two variants on this chassis – a tank with turret in the middle (apparently tested as a tier 9 heavy tank in WoT Blitz earlier this year) and a turretless TD. The concept of tank with rear turret didn’t have neither chassis nor turret looking like the one in game. Apparently WG still not done making up fake tanks.




    0
  19. WoTs player with 31k battles says:

    With the continued power/armor creep in the game, as demonstrated here, when is the poor IS4, one of the original tanks in game gonna get a buff to compete? It use to be really good back in the day, but now is a poor excuse for a Soviet tier 10 heavy. No one will work up the IS4 line until buffs are made to that tank.




    4

Leave a Reply