WoT Supertest: Object 726 Pt II


A little more has come out since DecoNoirs post so Pt II. Seems this is due to become a tier X Promotional tank and not part of the tech tree. First our trademark English overlay Russian screen grab and then pics of the beasts 3D model in the wild. Click for full size.


31 comments on “WoT Supertest: Object 726 Pt II

  1. Anonymous says:

    almost 2900 base dpm for a tank that is most likely a well armored beast.

  2. jakub_czyli_ja says:

    Seems pretty OP – no LFP, UFP 200 mm high angle, turret also a bunker, nice gun.

  3. Walter says:

    Just don’t.

    I mean let’s stay real: Today there are only MBTs for a reason and the reason is that all the Russian super heavys sucked in real life. They are too heavy for roads, too slow (70 km/h on IS7 is just stupidly unrealistic). Make these russian tanks what they where in the real world: Bad tanks.

    • Anonymous says:

      I can taste the salt through the web

    • wheeledtank says:

      The funny thing is that the IS-7 actually did reach 60km/h in trials

      • Walter says:

        “It was also able to achieve a top speed of 60 km/h thanks to a 1050-horsepower engine giving it a power to weight ratio of 15.4 hp/tonne” -wikipedia

        Wargaming: 59,6km/h, 1200hp, 17,6 hp/ton

        And everyone knows the top speed can be easily exceeded when going down a hill. In addition i am not an expert but i don’t think this high horse power engines were any reliable in 1948.

      • Anonymous says:

        Why its 17,6 instead of 15.4 anyway?

    • Anonymous says:

      fun to say, that 1050hp engine technology is from a ussr submarine.

    • pppp says:

      russia have bad tank in RL? ARE you real? When russia drive kv1 and T-34 german drive little pz1,pz2 tank. ANd look who is best tank is sirya war… tyrks leopard is brrning more then russia tank in same generation….

  4. Infernal969 says:

    Wargaming – We break our games just like we do our promises.

  5. Noone says:

    Is this shit for real?

  6. whitesample says:

    Uninstalling right now~ <3

  7. real_toothdecay says:

    I remember when Supertesters had to apply. WG did not want leaks. So……….

  8. real_toothdecay says:

    I remember when Supertesters had to apply.

  9. AKBird says:

    What’s the balancing factor? HE penetration?

  10. Anonymous says:

    seriously – fuck these greedy c*nts!

  11. Just curious says:

    What does “promotional tank” mean exactly? Like the Frankenstein?

  12. What this means? says:

    Promotional tank?

  13. I Could Be Good But War Gaming Will Fuck Me Over Anyway says:

    can get track shots all day long perma tracked anywhhere promotional yeah ok ,, give me a T22

  14. Anonymous says:

    Is this another pile of shit left by Murazor???

  15. Anonymous says:

    welcome to TXII
    yup, not even TXI, since most TX wont do shit, its basically a TXII
    Dear god, if its the work of the new balance guy, WG should fire him already, how could it be that much worse in such short amount of time ???

  16. mattbrix02 says:

    Potential tier X to replace the reward tank obj 260? :0

  17. Nameless says:

    Wait, uh… does this thing have 4 tracks? Like, 4 FUCKING TRACKS?
    I’ve seen the Object 279 but this thing? Uh, I think it’s a fake. Blatantly OP fake.

  18. Never mind says:

    FFS I thought WG sacked the moron that was responsible for all the ridiculously OP tanks. This thing needs to die in Super test

  19. Anonymous says:

    Well, at least it’s easy to tell where to shoot on the side/don’t have to worry about spaced armor eating the shells.

  20. hemihaynes says:

    I can’t be only one who remembers a QA post that they joked about people wanting the 279. Game play would be “You’ve been tracked” simulator.

  21. Anonymous says:

    It would have better armour then 268v4 and a turret


Leave a Reply