9.15.1 vs 9.16 Armor comparison screenshots


Back after being rendered on the bed for a few hours, woman flu is an even more serious business than Man flu. And need to tell you, I’m bringing extra hands into RSR for times like these.

Here’s some screenshot’s comparison between 9.15.1 and 9.16 vehicles that received armor changes:

In this article: AMX 50 Foch, Matilda IV, 112, A-43, M4A2E4 Sherman, C-51.

AMX 50 Foch

Matilda IV



M4A2E4 Sherman


Liked it? Take a second to support Rita Sobral on Patreon!
9.15.1 vs 9.16 Armor comparison screenshots

15 thoughts on “9.15.1 vs 9.16 Armor comparison screenshots

      1. honestly between their two options, america should probably choose to give up their independance for 4 years and be owned back by UK until a better candidate appears. Even tho UK doesnt work that well either these days lol

    1. When you look at Matilda II you dont see that the two areas to left and right of the front lower hull are just storage boxes. What you are seeing on the armor display is the armor that is actually modeled.

    1. Corvi says:

      Whats the problem ? The MG turret got a HUGE Buff and the Rangefinder only lost 30mm of armor, not like it couldnt be penned by everything anyway.
      Otherwise nothing changed.

      1. how many times you shot the MG turret when there is a “bigger” weakspot just next to it?

        actually that’s the point, why are they still wasting their time with this tank. nobody is playing with it anymore (except me i think). stop making something worse about that poor machine.

Leave a Reply