Armored Warfare models leaked: K-1, K-2, T-15, IS-7, AMX-13/90 & AMX 10 RC

Hello,

these AW models got leaked from Russia, they are at different stages of development:

K-1

K-2

T-15

IS-7

AMX-13/90

AMX 10 RC

 

Liked it? Take a second to support Rita Sobral on Patreon!
Armored Warfare models leaked: K-1, K-2, T-15, IS-7, AMX-13/90 & AMX 10 RC

42 thoughts on “Armored Warfare models leaked: K-1, K-2, T-15, IS-7, AMX-13/90 & AMX 10 RC

      1. Anonymous says:

        yep. the 76, 90, and 105 will be different tanks. this is just the model for the AMX 13(90)

    1. Lemme see,
      a) You are toxic
      b) AMX13s, IS7 are cold war vehicles, placed at Tier 2 (or possible Tier 3 premium in the IS7 case) alongside M48, T54, and the rest of early cold war vehicles.
      c) When WOT 2 comes out, and has Leo 2, T80, I wonder are you going to do similar post against your beloved WG?

      1. Jan :O says:

        Well mate a few of those tanks in WoT were invented by Wargaming. For example E-50M. Serb has even patents for them.

    2. Anonymous says:

      the retard that say let’s copy wot lmao , wot is getting old run like shit and for what the the tiny ass maps and nothing to show haha and don’t get me started on copy while wot 2 is copying aw your a sad person , people like you is the reason wot sucks your negativity and your toxic.

  1. Sgt S. says:

    Rita, u should totally take over for AW news until Spooky gets back to the Armored Talk. He’s been out for over 4 months now and it’d be great to actually get regular AW leaks

  2. septfox says:

    Man, I saw “T-15” and thought “wow, that sure is an old vehicle to include, it’s only tier 3 in WoT”. Then I remembered that there’ve been several T-15s made by various countries, and felt silly : \

    I expect the AMX 13/90 will play something like a Bagelpanzer without ATGMs, which could be pretty fun. The hull being modeled also opens up the opportunity to add prototypes/variants that we’d never get in WoT (AA quad 20mms, all-ATGMs, etc).

Leave a Reply to john Cancel reply