11 thoughts on “Dev. Diaries: New Swedish Medium Tanks”

1. Well this certainly was… interesting, pretty much what i expected but still

   March 8, 2019 at 9:09 pm Reply

   1. I’m still trying to figure out what researchable turret they have for the UDES 16.

      Or where the engine power and speed went from it and the 15/16…

      I’m cautiously excited for them, well the 16 at least

      March 9, 2019 at 5:54 am Reply

      1. there were two nearly identical designs of the UDES 14E (or 16 as it was later called) thatdiffered slightly in the length of the magazine behind the turret, there might have been some difference in the armor as well but iirc there was not

         as for the power to weight ratio and that stuff, thats just what you have to expect from current wagaming, they have not cared about any historical stat since early 2016

         March 9, 2019 at 11:07 am

      2. Feels bad man

         March 9, 2019 at 5:19 pm

      3. Though I wouldn’t put it past WG to throw the UDES 14A turret onto it.

         I honestly don’t know why WG are so intent on butchering the Swedish tanks

         March 9, 2019 at 7:02 pm

2. I have kreps

   March 8, 2019 at 10:39 pm Reply

3. 120mm will be too much. 105mm is sufficient

   March 9, 2019 at 2:19 am Reply

   1. 120mm is too much indeed. Unless its Russian. Russian mediums need a minimum of 120mm calibre.

      March 9, 2019 at 10:49 am Reply

4. Did that guy just admit to being the head of the (lack of) balance? Brave man.

   March 9, 2019 at 8:36 pm Reply

5. More ridge hopping tanks in addition to wheelies. Is mobility the new meta?

   March 10, 2019 at 1:12 am Reply

   1. If it had power to weight or top speed then sure. Tier 10s got similar speed and power to weight as the M48.

      If it had the 544hp engine and estimated 70km/h top speed then sure. But in typical WG fashion they’ve given it an impenetrable turret while reducing mobility and gun handling

      March 10, 2019 at 6:28 am Reply