Hello everyone,
Today we have the stats for the Swedish Tier IX heavy tank as they are in supertest.
EMIL II
Tier: 9
Hitpoints: 1700
Maximum speed: 56/18 km/h
Hull traverse: 25 deg/sec
Turret traverse: 20 deg/sec (only gun)
Aimspeed: 3.0s
Viewrange: 380m
Damage: 400/??/??
Penetration: 242/??/??
Reload: 40s (autoload gun) 4 shells in drum
Elevation/Depression: -12deg/+8deg
More depression than elevation lel
You might say that the tank is quite depressing.
Oh boy another amx 50 120
Well the 50120 has awful depression and elevation, this one has more depression than any tank in the game but the Dicker Max. making it a hull down autoloading beast that are way more confortable to play and because of the angle, it might be able to bounce shells while doing so.
You forgot the st.emil
And the D1, that has if I recall 23 degrees of depression.
Renault Otsu also has like 20 degrees. So you’re wrong.
“More depression than any tank in the game besides Dicker Max”
Top kek
Actually there is I think a Swedish TD coming with the swedish tree that has even more gun depression to the point where it could hull down on a hillside with only the gun showing over the hill.
Yes, they a have a few that can do that. But a pity S-tank isn’t really a TD but a MBT/medium. Wg is being silly. 🙁
Correction: best anticipated gun depression for a tier 9 tank, people forget a cromwell can have 14 degrees of gun depression if it spams gold from its second best gun and there are many tanks at tier iii that boast 20 degrees of gun depression like french and british tanks
IS-3 with insane gun depres. and AMX 50 B gun and turret..surely not OP
Well, it looks shit
I don’t like the AMX 50 120 very much, and this one looks quite similar so far in most respects. Not impressed. Wonder how long it will take between shots, though. The 3.3 sec the AMX takes between shots is perhaps the worst feature of the tank.
…that’s much less per round then the other tier x heavies with the same damage and its faster so u can quickly hide to reload. If the tank is bad then u must be a horrible player, no offense.
To unload the clip you need roughly 13 seconds, which is means you cannot unload the full clip peek-a-boo style without getting an answer, which will hurt, since you have little armour, especially if your opponent knows what he’s doing and tracks you. This does not mean that it cannot work, but it does not work like, say, on the AMX 50 100. But yeah, I am horrible, and you are genius, of course. Never let an opportunity slip to troll others when you can, right?
At least this one has epic gundepression. 😀
3 seconds aim time 😐 Well that sux 🙁
Not 3 secs aiming time; its 3.33 secs between shots. Aiming time is about 2,59 secs, without modules and perks, If Im correct.
funny that the pics are from himmelsdorf, where that elevation will cause some “oh shit wtf” moments…
So the better gun depression is balanced by having considerably worse tank/turret traverse then the 50 120? It’ll all be about the time between shells.
More clones. Looks French to me.
Interesting. Whether in a good way, or a bad way remains to be seen.
3 seconds of aim plus 242 mm pen w/o gold is pretty bad. I wonder if it’s going to have good accuracy to compensate for low pen and long aim time.
How is that bad? All the T9 heavies have between 240-260 mm of pen. Maybe you should spam less gold and actually learn to aim for once?
240 pen in a speedy autoloader at tier 9 is now considered bad. OK.
Patton and e50 are cursing you for your bad memmory… i think they have 218 and 220 mm pen guns… how is 240 bad? I haven’t met a tank that I couldn’t handle with that penn. Yeah it tough if you meet a t10 heavy from front, but that crosshair is not only for auto aim 🙂
Would honestly rather it be a single shot gun. Last thing we need is an insanely fast tank with a 120mm autoloader (or there abouts based on damage)
You should see what the tier 10 would be like if they added with its its historical modules
It would be the hull of a T-10 or even IS7 and a 50B turret with 180mm armor and a 15cm gun.
Basically a Foch 155 with a turret.
And the saddest thing is Wg are removing the 155 from the Foch 155 (Now Foch (Auto)) because they didn’t like its power, playsyle, ect reasons and now they add this new hideous Waffletractor MK II in.
Oh I know what they’re doing to the Foch 155, It’s become the tier 9 with an autoloading 120mm gun instead of the 155mm… Not a bad thing. Honestly I don’t thing autoloaders should be in the game, they’re just too hard to balance compared to a regular single shot
Any pics with brighter screen or place ? Dessert maps are better don’t you think
well they don’t have much choice in what screenshots they get, you’d have to ask the peopel who make the screenshots which are some russian people
Next Autoloader super fast paper tank (glass cannon). The Meta of the game really develops in a direction that is not very pleasing IMHO.
But penetration and reload time are pretty shitty though…
Your life is pretty shitty though
“Glass cannon”
[…] źródło: SR […]
This is like a poor man’s version of the 50 120
I see problems if it’s a popular line in randoms. Anyone pushing forward will get popped off rapidly whilst the usual suspects will stay and hide giving them change to reload. It’s probably well balanced, it’ll just make tier 7 -> x suck for a few weeks whilst they are the new flavour of the month.
Looks like a lower dpm AMX 50 120 with a 110 hull and comet gun depression. The AMX 50 120 is already below the power curve so creating this lower dpm and slightly better armored tank will keep it at the same power level as a 110. Most of this tank’s leaked stats don’t line up with historical stuff but as statistically the 110 has worse armor efficiency than an IS-3 according to vAbbidct so I would expect this armor to fall short as well even though it is supposed to be better than a 50 120. What is important though is the intra-clip reload if it will be 3 sec long or 2.5 sec long makes a big difference for an autoloader and its abillity to perma track its prey in the open and also managing the tank’s dpm. This tank will almost always have to play on hills to get its turret to an autobounce angle and avoid being caught with its pants down because its 8 degrees of gun elevation can be crippling. The tank’s front also sticks out a lot which I find as an annoying problem of the 110 and its pike nose. If the tank had its turret mounted mid section then side scrapping would be an option
Gun depression has to be an error
Id actually relate the hull more to the E50, its going to be bouncy under the right circumstances. But in terms of movement characteristics, its likely going to be like the E50. It might be fast, but it will take considerable amounts of time to actually reach that speed and it will only really maintain that speed when traveling in a strait line.
As for the turret I really think it compares better to the T54E1, they are both 4 shot autos, it can bounce hits if the angle is good. But expect penetrating hits if you get caught out.
And given it has less health then some t9 mediums, getting caught out is going to cost you heavily.
Also i dont think this will be another WT E100, The WT was a highley accurate sniper, this thing looks like its accuracy iwill be compareable to a russian heavy. It will be a mid to close range support tank.
Aren’t the Swedes “thing” having good acc autoloaders though?