Go skim through the original 9.21 HD model article. Someone in the comments posted a photo of an old wooden model of one T28 design proposal that used this layout. That’s already more historically accurate than the imaginary piece of trash currently in your garage.
The armour of the T28 isn’t to far off from what I expected.
Only the LGP is different then expected, but that was to give tier 6s and 7s, and some 8s I suppose, a chance to damage it when they meet one head on. Though it’s not very hard to hide that’s for sure.
So what exactly are they basing the T28’s new looks on?
I dunno maybe the t95 like the t28 is supposed to look like? They are the same fucking tank after all
The T95, both are from the same project if I remember correctly.
@Jetcannon, they’re basing it on the T28, except they’ve screwed with the mantlet for some reason.
Go skim through the original 9.21 HD model article. Someone in the comments posted a photo of an old wooden model of one T28 design proposal that used this layout. That’s already more historically accurate than the imaginary piece of trash currently in your garage.
holy shit thats a good buff to the t28
Its easy, they look statistic, and they see that in curent status is garbage.
wow this T28 is have op buff. Now is a monster…And wg remove me bl10 to my isu 152…. ;(
260mm of pen can still go through 254mm of armor
The new T28 looked like a T95 that lost a pair of tracks. Well deserved buff though.
Well, that’s exactly what it was. T28 and T95 were the same tank, just different designations.
IRL that’s actually exactly what it was:
http://www.armorjournal.com/Walkarounds/SPG/T28-T95/T28-T95_NACM-27.JPG
The armour of the T28 isn’t to far off from what I expected.
Only the LGP is different then expected, but that was to give tier 6s and 7s, and some 8s I suppose, a chance to damage it when they meet one head on. Though it’s not very hard to hide that’s for sure.
Still, not a bad armour buff at all.
T28 changes seem like a potential nerf with that flat frontal armor you’ll see plenty of tanks penning that.
yea lets not buff leo 1 cuz 47 winrate is not low enough but 140 had 49.5 winrate YEA LUL WG
I get your point but you sound like an utter retard