Test the New Graphics Engine
A downloadable utility to test how ready your rig is for the new HD graphics. You can download World of Tanks enCore here – http://wotencore.net/ .
Portuguese Armada
100 User(s) Online
Join Server
A downloadable utility to test how ready your rig is for the new HD graphics. You can download World of Tanks enCore here – http://wotencore.net/ .
Graphics be dope.
I must say this: WG is making a fine job with new graphics and the HD maps look orgasmic. This enCore programe is an excellente tool.
Not everything that comes out of those guys is retarded…
Sure they can do great things. But for every great thing, there’s a thousand others that are bad…
Could someone teach the good people of WG how to set-up proper SSL security?
Score of 9680 with GTX 1050 ti on Ultra…
I got a score of 22000 on ultra settings so I guess I will be fine
what is your PC spec??
Asus H170-pro motherboard
I5-6600k CPU
MSI Geforce GTX 1070 gaming X
Also 8GB DDR RAM (going to upgrade it to 16GB in thr near future)
I got 16k, seemed fine as well.
Based on the demo the game seems to be playable on my 7years old toaster. I dont get why does it give some arbitrary score instead of something like min/max/avg fps?
Over 10.000 on ultra settings on a system from January 2009 with the exception of my the graphics card (which is also ancient by now).
Core i7 920 @ 3.6 GHz
6GB DDR3-1600
2GB nVidia GTX 770
It’s a big step forward in comparison to the current client. And just as smooth (which is not hard considering how dated current WoT looks like and only runs around 100 fps-ish on max details).
Just under 10k for me with similar setup
AMD FX6300 @ 3.5, 16GB ram, GTX 770 2GB. (my gtx is dying perf is throttled down a little)
The new graphics update is a huge improvement visually but also in terms of performance optimization
[…] World of Tanks – enCore […]
I got almost 12k on “ultra” and 32k on “medium” with following specs:
i5 2500k @ 4GHz
16GB DDR3-1600
2GB NVidia GTX770
I think there is room for some tweaking i.e. restrict prerendered frames and such in the drivers menue …
win 10 home 64bit, i5 3570, ddr3 16gb, gtx 970 4gb = 15522 (default ultra gfx in 1080p) …. T_T
Intel Core i7 5960X, DDR4 32gb 3200mhz, GTX 1080 FE, Evga Supernova G2 650w, Corsair h115i, Windows 8.1.
you forgot to mention youre score 😉
win 10 pro 64bit , 32GB DDR4 3200 , GTX 1080Ti , I7 8700k @ 5,1GHz
1080p = 41136 on Ultra Settings
lol.. someone is down voting all the comments ?? why
This I asked myself a lot … because some people stating/ exchanging their experiences?! ^^
Maybe someone’s jealous 🙂
I down voted your comment just because. LOL
i5 7400 , 16GB DDR4 , NVIDIA 1060 3GB Zotac core edition – 16253 score on Ultra settings
i5 3570k Overclocked @ 4.8gHz
GTX970 Overclocked ~ 7 – 12%
16GB DDR3
Installed on Samsung EvoB SSD
17,546
Ultra 1080p
115 – 120fps
Happy 🙂
Here is one of the things that bothers me about the tool:
1) They state it isn’t a benchmark but it provides “points” to compare to others. Ummmm…. if it isn’t benchmarking, how is it determining the “points”?
2) It bases the number (which we have no clue how that equates to FPS) on a replay. The tool should show FPS at all times and it should simulate, or allow you to, actual gameplay to compare with the current game. I don’t see anything in the replay that would really stress FPS like what we see in a match.
ryzen 1700 3.8 oc
nvidia 1080ti
16Gb DDR4
samsung 960 evo SSD
2560×1440 ultra
=24000