WoT Micropatch 0.9.19_2

Over night The three clusters RU EU and NA will be issuing this micropatch. The servers will be unavailable during the downtimes which for each region are as follows:

  • RU. June 8 from 6:00 to 6:45 (MSC)
  • EU. 08.06.2017 from 06:00 to 06:45 CEST
  • NA. June 8th 2017 at 02:00 Pacific Time (09:00 UTC) for 1 hour.

Patch notes:

  • Fixed the issue where the interface froze upon switching from the Ranked Battle missions screen to the Garage.
  • Fixed the issue with changing the chat’s window size.
  • Reintroduced the ability to lock the camera by pressing RMB after reassigning the button for target lock.
  • Fixed some technical issues.

Information.

When maintenance has completed please restart World of Tanks using the launcher file (WOTLauncher.exe) and ensure your game client updates properly.

If automatic updating has been enabled in the launcher settings, make sure that the client has finished updating.

Liked it? Take a second to support jerryatrick53 on Patreon!
WoT Micropatch 0.9.19_2

12 thoughts on “WoT Micropatch 0.9.19_2

  1. LSK says:

    “Reintroduced the ability to lock the camera by pressing RMB after reassigning the button for target lock.”

    Yes!! Finally it is back.

  2. disappointed WoT player says:

    You know Wargaming over that past year has really WRECKED this game!! The patches just get worse and worse, without any response to player requests, and buggier every time. We have had our friends list here in the NA server broken for 3-4 weeks now, and today I cannot play a game without server creating major lag! We only have about 14-16k players total on at any one time, the NA West server having 4-8k players, and they cannot provide a reliable server. The EU server can have 50k players on one server with no issues. No wonder the NA server is way down in player count over the last year or so.

    1. bbmoose says:

      Well, I can’t agree with you on that. I think WG has improved a lot the last year. Even arty hasn’t been in a better place then now.

      Sure, there are some things that are simply bad, like the Maus and Type 5 overbuff, the OP premiums that are wrecking tier 8 gameplay and the lack of new (and good) maps, but that doesn’t mean WG hasn’t improved with other things. They always take one step back, before taking two forward.

      People don’t like change. There will always be a certain meta that you have to adapt to and that meta has changed a bit over the last year. It’s a shame WoT is nearly dead on NA, but here on EU the game is still going strong.

  3. Pang Zhu says:

    “Reintroduced the ability to lock the camera by pressing RMB after reassigning the button for target lock.”

    This is exactly why they should start reading feedback of the community… Wasting time on implementing stuff that nobody wanted and then realising that it’s better to reverse it.

    The good old fixing what doesn’t need to be fixed.

    I know this one a small issue, but in light of what has been done since Rubicon and now Rubicon 2.0, this somehow triggered me.

  4. Jesus Christ. I have to redownload a modpack everytime they “fix” something. Every couple of days. It’s becoming a pain. Let me just play the freakin game instead of dealing with the modpack so often. Dumb WG. Just look at the version number – 0.9.19.0.2… For Christ’s sake….

      1. Lol, my comment was nowhere near toxic. I don’t know what drugs you on. Or maybe just didn’t read with comprehension. There wasn’t even an insult so I don’t know what’s with all the tripping. cheers

    1. jerryatrick53 says:

      A couple for blood pressure and an anti inflammatory. I understood you perfectly which is why you aren’t banned just warned.

  5. Concerned and Experienced WoT Player says:

    Is it just me, or did the micropatch create more problems for the NA server? My friends list is now completely gone and cannot see anyone, plus I was having major lag issues until I closed out the WG Game Center.

    Please Wargaming… please don’t wreck this awesome game that has so much potential!

Leave a Reply